Would it be possible for a mind to replicate itself in Cartesian substance dualism?

What is the problem with Cartesian dualism?

Known to philosophers as the mind-body problem, Descartes’ theory’s shortcoming is its inability to explain how things belonging in the mind category can interact with things in the body category. The problem would simply disappear if the two substances did not interact.

What was Cartesian dualism?

the position taken by René Descartes that the world comprises two distinct and incompatible classes of substance: res extensa, or extended substance, which extends through space; and res cogitans, or thinking substance, which has no extension in space.

Can the mind exist independently of the body?

It is possible one’s mind might exist without one’s body. One’s mind is a different entity from one’s body.

What is a Cartesian mind?

This term refers to the conception of the mind that originated with René Descartes (1596–1650). More generally, it refers to a conception of the mind that gives primacy to the first-person perspective in discussing issues about the nature of mental states and mental concepts.

What is the best objection to Cartesian dualism?

the interaction problem

The most commonly heard objection to Substance Dualism is the interaction problem, first raised by Princess Elizabeth of Bohemia in her correspondence with Descartes. Dualism says that the soul and the body are substances of contrary natures yet that they somehow causally influence each other.

Is Cartesian dualism plausible?

While Descartes theory of mind presents many inherent problems; as a form of dualism, it is the most plausible theory of mind.

What is Cartesian dualism quizlet?

Cartesian Dualism says that both material and immaterial substances exist. Physicalism says that only physical-law-following objects and forces exist. The immaterial substances of Cartesian Dualism have no physical properties, and thus do not follow physical law.

What did René Descartes disagree with the concept of dualism?

Rene Descartes’ Argument from Divisibility is the argument in which he claims that the mind and the body are two completely different things and thus cannot be identical. His argument is that the body is divisible because it can be physically altered like being cut in half.

When was Cartesian dualism created?

3. Descartes’ Dualism. The most famous philosophical work of René Descartes is the Meditations on First Philosophy (1641). In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes calls the mind a thing that thinks and not an extended thing.

Is Cartesian dualism the same as substance dualism?

Now substance dualism was made prominent by the philosopher rene descartes. And so it is often referred to as cartesian dualism. The main idea behind substance dualism is that the mind and body are

What is the difference between dualism and Cartesian dualism?

Dualism, simply put, is the belief that something is composed of two fundamentally different components, and it was around long before Descartes put pen to page. Cartesian Dualism deals specifically with the dual existence of man.

What does Strawson suggest as the central difficulty of Cartesian dualism?

Strawson expounds the difficulty for the dualist first with the predication difficulty. In this argument, he tentatively suggests that the Cartesian dualist is committed to thinking that there is a philosophically more revealing way of talking about people than our everyday way.

Does Strawson believe in free will?

Strawson denies the existence of free will, but is sympathetic to its illusion: “We are not really free and truly responsible agents at all, even if we cannot help believing we are” (p. 311).

How does Strawson compare inductive reasoning to the law?

Strawson says that induction just is rational, the reasonable and rational is that which is inductively justified. To call an argument reasonable or unreasonable is to apply inductive standards just as calling an argument valid or invalid is applying deductive standards.

What does Strawson attempt to achieve in his article?

Strawson makes an attempt to show that the concept of person is primitive or simple in the sense that it cannot be further analysed. The whole argument is based on a group of central P-predicates which are other-ascribable and self ascribable.

How does Strawson explain the concept of person in his philosophy discuss?

According to Strawson, the concept of a person is the concept of a type of entity such that both predicates of consciousness and predicates of corporeal characteristics are equally applicable to single individual. ● Strawson makes a distinction between M-predicates and P- predicates.

What is Strawson view on description?

Strawson argues that the men in his example used the same sentence in two different ways: “the first man, in using the same sentence, made a true assertion, while the second man, in using the same sentence, made a false assertion.” From Strawson’s argument, it is also plausible to maintain that the two men nevertheless …