What’s wrong with meritocracy?

What is the possible consequence of meritocracy?

One implication is that Meritocracy beliefs can operate as social equalizer, allowing people to achieve higher status, or a social justifier meaning (e.g., Levy et al., 2006), acting as a SLB by offering a socially acceptable explanation that stabilizes existing status differences.

Is meritocracy The cause of inequality?

In his book The Meritocracy Trap, Yale Law School’s Daniel Markovits argues that rather than democratizing American society, meritocracy has contributed to increasing inequality and the decline of the middle class.

What’s the idea behind a meritocracy?

Meritocracy (merit, from Latin mereō, and -cracy, from Ancient Greek κράτος kratos ‘strength, power’) is a political system in which economic goods and/or political power are vested in individual people based on talent, effort, and achievement, rather than wealth or social class.

What’s the opposite of meritocracy?

The opposite of meritocracy is kakistocracy, or the rule of the worst.

How is meritocracy a justification for social inequality?

Meritocracy and the justification of inequality. If the status hierarchy is based on merit, the logical inference is that those who have higher status must also be more talented, valuable, hardworking, or in other ways more meritorious than those who have lower status.

What is an example of meritocracy?

Meritocracy is the idea that people get ahead based on their own accomplishments rather than, for example, on their parents’ social class.

Is Switzerland a meritocracy?

Thus, Switzerland is found in a particular configuration where an individual’s place in society is highly determined not only by his or her educational attainment, but also by his or her social background. In other words, Switzerland constitutes a sort of “non-meritocratic meritocracy”.

What is hereditary meritocracy?


Mr Menon also warned about the risk of hereditary meritocracy, which is when. society’s elites reproduce themselves and parents naturally pass on their privileges — be it in education, income or wealth — to their children.

Is meritocracy a belief?

Meritocracy is a false and not very salutary belief. As with any ideology, part of its draw is that it justifies the status quo, explaining why people belong where they happen to be in the social order. It is a well-established psychological principle that people prefer to believe that the world is just.

Why is a meritocracy important?

Meritocracy as an ideal remains relevant — it guards against corruption, discrimination, and unfair practices. However, there is recognition that our commitment to meritocracy should be tempered with broader social values such as compassion, humility, and regard for the poor.

What are the benefits of meritocracy?

It prioritizes performance and uses it as a scale for promotions, bonuses, and other rewards. It tends to make employers learn from more skilled coworkers, thereby leading to self-development. It promotes equal grounds for people from different races, classes, and socio-economic backgrounds.

Is meritocracy the same as equality?

Meritocratic Equality of Opportunity builds on Formal Equality of Opportunity’s opposition to formal and arbitrary discrimination. Meritocracy requires that positions and goods be distributed solely in accordance with individual merit.

What are the characteristics of meritocracy?

Individuals in a meritocratic system feel valued, believe their abilities are recognised, and have incentives to improve their professional performance. In such a context, individuals experience their environment as fair and feel more confident about themselves, others and their work.

Is Google a meritocracy?

Google’s function as meritocracy lies in its policies and decision-making.

What do Functionalists say about meritocracy?

Functionalists Davis and Moore state that we live in a meritocratic society as the education system acts as a mechanism to ensure individuals do the right jobs (see role allocation). Therefore, individuals that work hard will be rewarded in society, whilst those who do not will not be rewarded.