What is the difference between the Narrative Fallacy and the Post-hoc Rationalization?

What is narrative fallacy?

Taleb coined the term the “Narrative Fallacy”, referring to our limited ability to look at sequences of facts without weaving an explanation into them. “We seek explanations even to the point that we will manufacture them”, he writes.

How do you avoid narrative fallacies?

When we are willing to ask both types of questions and try our best to answer them, we can start to see which elements are simply part of the story rather than causal contributors. A second way we can circumvent narrative is to simply avoid or reinterpret sources of information most subject to the bias.

What is an example of narrative fallacy?

Narrative Fallacy Examples

Here are a few examples of narrative fallacy: History is presented as an inevitable march of a sequence of events, rather than a chaotic mishmash of influences and people. If the past were so easily predictable in hindsight, then why is it so hard to predict the future?

Why is straw man a fallacy?

Straw person is the misrepresentation of an opponent’s position or a competitor’s product to tout one’s own argument or product as superior. This fallacy occurs when the weakest version of an argument is attacked while stronger ones are ignored.

Is post hoc a logical fallacy?

Post hoc (a shortened form of post hoc, ergo propter hoc) is a logical fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier.

What is red herring fallacy?

This fallacy consists in diverting attention from the real issue by focusing instead on an issue having only a surface relevance to the first. Examples: Son: “Wow, Dad, it’s really hard to make a living on my salary.” Father: “Consider yourself lucky, son.

Related posts:

What are the reasons for which an idea can be subjective? Did anyone argue that mathematical concepts and principles are neither true or false? Hume’s definition of cause and effect? What are the books of Pythagoras? What terms in Spinoza’s Ethics have antiquated or obscure definitions? What separates the middle works of Nietzsche from his later works? The origin of a particular self-reference paradox? Modern Epicureanism? Why is a lion not evil? Intuitively, why is ¬(P ↔ Q) ≡ P ↔ ¬Q?