Contents
Do impossible worlds exist?
The worlds we are interested in are not in there. These worlds are often called logically impossible worlds, as logical laws such as the Law of Non-Contradiction or the Law of Excluded Middle are assumed to be the most general and topic-neutral: they are supposed to hold at all possible worlds.
What does it mean to be true in a possible world?
A possible world is a complete and consistent way the world is or could have been.
What is possible worlds theory?
The basis of possible worlds theory is “the set-theoretical idea that reality—the sum of the imaginable—is a universe composed of a plurality of distinct elements. This universe is hierarchically structured by the opposition of one well-designated element, to all the other members of the set” (Ryan 2005, 446).
What is logically impossible in philosophy?
Something is logically impossible if it is contradictory, or against the laws of logic. Thus a round square is a logical impossibility, and it is logically impossible to be a tall man without being tall. But it is not logically impossible to dissolve gold in water.
What is metaphysically possible?
Metaphysical possibility is one way of thinking about the possibility of something being the case, a way that is often of special relevance to philosophers. If you think about it, we often use the phrase ‘x is possible’ in a variety of ways.
What are the laws of logic?
There are three laws upon which all logic is based, and they’re attributed to Aristotle. These laws are the law of identity, law of non-contradiction, and law of the excluded middle. According to the law of identity, if a statement is true, then it must be true.
Why did Lewis believe in possible worlds?
Importantly, Lewis claimed that there are no logical gaps, meaning that every way a world can be some world is: “If there are many worlds, and every way that a world could possibly be is a way that some world is, then whenever such-and-such might be the case, there is some world where such-and-such is the case” (1986, …
What is Lewis argument for the existence of possible worlds?
86) Lewis’s argument here is: The actual world is not a set of sentences. The actual world is a possible world. All possible worlds are the same kind of thing: one of them is a set of sentences iff they all are a set of sentences.
Who came up with possible worlds?
David Lewis
2.1.
The originator and, by far, the best known proponent of concretism is David Lewis. For Lewis and, as noted, concretists generally, the actual world is the concrete physical universe as it is, stretched out in space-time. As he rather poetically expresses it (1986, 1):
What does Epistemically possible mean?
An epistemic possibility is something that may be true, given the relevant epistemic constraints (for example, “Given what we know about the weather, it might rain tomorrow”), while an epistemic necessity is something that must be true given the relevant epistemic constraints (for example, “I don’t see Julie’s car in …
Does Conceivability entail possibility?
Conceivability is prima facie evidence of metaphysical possibility, but it does not entail metaphysical possibility. To endorse ‘Defeasible Modal Rationalism’ is to say that p’s being (ideally, positively, primarily) conceivable constitutes a merely prima facie reason to believe that p is metaphysically possible.
How is something logically possible?
Logical possibility refers to a logical proposition that cannot be disproved, using the axioms and rules of a given system of logic. The logical possibility of a proposition will depend upon the system of logic being considered, rather than on the violation of any single rule.
Can something be logically possible but physically impossible?
Everything that is physically possible is logically possible, but the converse isn’t true.
What is logical possibility example?
You can consider a statement logically possible one if there are no contradictions for it to be true. For example, the statement “Julian is sickly” is considered logically possible since “Julian” and “sickly” is not contradicting each other.
What is a logical contradiction?
A logical contradiction is the conjunction of a statement S and its denial not-S. In logic, it is a fundamental law- the law of non contradiction- that a statement and its denial cannot both be true at the same time. Here are some simple examples of contradictions. 1. I love you and I don’t love you.
Is a paradox true?
A paradox is a logically self-contradictory statement or a statement that runs contrary to one’s expectation. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to a seemingly self-contradictory or a logically unacceptable conclusion.
Can two contradictory things be true?
Dialetheism (from Greek δι- di- ‘twice’ and ἀλήθεια alḗtheia ‘truth’) is the view that there are statements which are both true and false. More precisely, it is the belief that there can be a true statement whose negation is also true. Such statements are called “true contradictions”, dialetheia, or nondualisms.
What is the difference between a paradox and a contradiction?
Contradiction: conflicting elements within the same system; Paradox: conflicting elements revealing a previously unknown truth; Irony: a resolution that is opposite what would be expected.
What is a paradoxical person?
1 : a statement that seems to say opposite things and yet is perhaps true. 2 : a person or thing having qualities that seem to be opposite. paradox. noun. par·a·dox | \ ˈpar-ə-ˌdäks \
Whats the difference between paradox and oxymoron?
An oxymoron is the conjunction of two words with meanings that contradict each other. While a paradox is the opposition of ideas or themes, an oxymoron is a contradiction merely between words.
What’s the difference between paradox and irony?
Irony ‘“ refers to real or literary situations or conversations where the evident meaning of a statement or action is incongruous with its intended meaning. Paradox ‘“ refers to a statement that defies intuition as it leads to seemingly irreconcilable contradictions.
What do you call something that contradicts itself?
A paradox is a rhetorical device or a self-contradictory statement that can actually be true. While an oxymoron is a figure of speech that pairs two opposing words. The key to easily spotting the difference is to focus on the meanings of the words themselves.
Whats the difference between irony and juxtaposition?
is that irony is a statement that, when taken in context, may actually mean something different from, or the opposite of, what is written literally; the use of words expressing something other than their literal intention, often in a humorous context while juxtaposition is the nearness of objects with no delimiter.
Related posts:
Is there any rigorous philosophical basis for atheism?
Fallacy of the arbitrary threshold?
What logical fallacy is the statement that “A good person would do X” as an argument against not doing X?
Can you choose the things you want?
How does contemporary philosophy treat Kant’s antinomies?
Why is it so difficult to write good Philosophy textbooks?
Can we know the fundamental nature of space and time?
How to define “harm” in ethics?
What does “Something” mean ontologically?
What is the distinction between individuals and particulars?