Is there a logical fallacy for confusing a word’s definition with its connotation?

What is fallacy of Amphiboly?

The fallacy of amphiboly happens when someone uses grammar or punctuation in a way that a statement could be interpreted as having more than one meaning, so it is unclear what is really meant. Other names for the fallacy are the fallacy of ambiguity, misusing ambiguity, and the fallacy of unclearness.

What is the fallacy of redefinition?

This happens when the redefinition applies to some things that the original definition did not, and fails to apply to other things that the original did. For example, if we redefine “bird” as “flying animal”, then bats would be “birds” (low), while flightless birds would not (high).

What is the strawman fallacy?

This fallacy occurs when, in attempting to refute another person’s argument, you address only a weak or distorted version of it. Straw person is the misrepresentation of an opponent’s position or a competitor’s product to tout one’s own argument or product as superior.

What fallacy uses words with different meaning?

The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument.

What is ad baculum fallacy?

Appeals to Emotion and Desire

The Latin term argumentum ad baculum means “argument to the stick.” This fallacy occurs whenever a person makes an implicit or explicit threat of physical or psychological violence against others if they refuse to accept the conclusions offered.

What is ad Verecundiam fallacy?

Argumentum ad Verecundiam fallacy (argument from inappropriate authority): an appeal to the testimony of an authority outside of the authority’s special field of expertise.

Why is reductio ad absurdum a fallacy?

Reductio ad absurdum is also known as “reducing to an absurdity.” It involves characterizing an opposing argument in such a way that it seems to be ridiculous, or the consequences of the position seem ridiculous.

What is division fallacy?

A fallacy of division is an informal fallacy that occurs when one reasons that something that is true for a whole must also be true of all or some of its parts. An example: The second grade in Jefferson elementary eats a lot of ice cream.

What is an example of ad Populum?

For example, “You need to pass me in this course, since I’ll lose my scholarship if you don’t.” ​Argumentum Ad Populum (Argument To The People):​ going along with the crowd in support of a conclusion.

What is an example of a fallacy of ambiguity?

For example: “All beetles have six legs. John Lennon is a Beatle, so John Lennon has six legs.” We can render the above argument valid (but not sound) by adding the premiss “All Beatles are beetles.” The two syllogisms that comprise the sorites are, then, “All beetles have six legs.

What is fallacy of division with example?

A fallacy of division is an informal fallacy that occurs when one reasons that something that is true for a whole must also be true of all or some of its parts. An example: The second grade in Jefferson elementary eats a lot of ice cream. Carlos is a second-grader in Jefferson elementary.

What are some examples of ambiguity?

Below are some common examples of ambiguity:

  • A good life depends on a liver – Liver may be an organ or simply a living person.
  • Foreigners are hunting dogs – It is unclear whether dogs were being hunted, or foreigners are being spoken of as dogs.

What is an example of a slippery slope argument?

An example of a slippery slope argument is the following: legalizing prostitution is undesirable because it would cause more marriages to break up, which would in turn cause the breakdown of the family, which would finally result in the destruction of civilization.

What is a non sequitur logical fallacy?

In fallacy: Material fallacies. (7) The fallacy of non sequitur (“it does not follow”) occurs when there is not even a deceptively plausible appearance of valid reasoning, because there is an obvious lack of connection between the given premises and the conclusion drawn from them.

Which is an example of the red herring fallacy?

More everyday examples of the red herring fallacy include: Distracting a child – “You’re right, that toy in the toy shop looks really fun. Let’s go home and see what fun toys we have there!” Convincing a parent to lend you the car – “I know you don’t want me to borrow the car, but I was going to pick up coffee for you.

What is an example of a false dichotomy?

The terms “false dilemma” and “false dichotomy” are often used interchangeably. Example: You can either get married or be alone for the rest of your life. False dichotomies are related to false dilemmas because they both prompt listeners to choose between two unrelated options.

Is post hoc a logical fallacy?

Post hoc (a shortened form of post hoc, ergo propter hoc) is a logical fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier.

What is the false dilemma fallacy?

Sometimes called the “either-or” fallacy, a false dilemma is a logical fallacy that presents only two options or sides when there are many options or sides. Essentially, a false dilemma presents a “black and white” kind of thinking when there are actually many shades of gray.

What is a true dichotomy?

A genuine (true) dichotomy is a set of alternatives that are both mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive. A set of alternatives A and B are mutually exclusive if and only if no member of A is a member of B.

What is an example of non sequitur?

non sequitur Add to list Share. A non sequitur is a conclusion or reply that doesn’t follow logically from the previous statement. You’ve probably heard an example of a non sequitur before, therefore bunny rabbits are way cuter than chipmunks.

What is poisoning the well fallacy?

Poisoning the well is a logical fallacy (a type of ad hominem argument) in which a person attempts to place an opponent in a position from which he or she is unable to reply.

What is stacking the deck fallacy?

The term stacking the deck is a fallacy in which any evidence that supports an opposing argument is simply rejected, omitted, or ignored. Stacking the deck is a technique that’s commonly used in propaganda.