Contents
What is the strawman fallacy?
This fallacy occurs when, in attempting to refute another person’s argument, you address only a weak or distorted version of it. Straw person is the misrepresentation of an opponent’s position or a competitor’s product to tout one’s own argument or product as superior.
What is dogmatism fallacy?
Dogmatism shuts down discussion by asserting that the writer’s beliefs are the only acceptable ones. Example: I’m sorry, but I think penguins are sea creatures and that’s that.
What is the fallacy of ad hominem?
(Attacking the person): This fallacy occurs when, instead of addressing someone’s argument or position, you irrelevantly attack the person or some aspect of the person who is making the argument.
What is an ambiguous fallacy?
A fallacy of ambiguity is a flaw of logic, where the meaning of a statement is not entirely clear. This can create statements which are both compelling and incorrect, either by accident or by design. Unfortunate phrasing is often responsible for unintentional humor.
What is Steelman?
A steel man is the practice of making someone’s argument stronger. This is the opposite of a straw man whereby you misrepresent your opponent’s position as being absurd or weak before offering a rebuttal.
What is a non sequitur?
(7) The fallacy of non sequitur (“it does not follow”) occurs when there is not even a deceptively plausible appearance of valid reasoning, because there is an obvious lack of connection between the given premises and the conclusion drawn from them.
What is black and white fallacy?
Black & White Thinking – the fallacy of leaping from the falsity (or undesirability) of one proposition to the truth (or desirability) of an extreme opposite – is identical in its basic logical structure to False Dichotomy.
What is name calling fallacy?
Ad hominem means “against the man,” and this type of fallacy is sometimes called name calling or the personal attack fallacy. This type of fallacy occurs when someone attacks the person instead of attacking his or her argument.
What is division fallacy?
A fallacy of division is an informal fallacy that occurs when one reasons that something that is true for a whole must also be true of all or some of its parts. An example: The second grade in Jefferson elementary eats a lot of ice cream.
What is the opposite of Strawmanning?
steel manning
The first step of Dennett’s approach has been called steel manning. It’s the opposite of strawmanning, in which you misrepresent the other person’s position or argument so you can easily defeat it. In contrast to a strawman, a steel man is an improved form of the other person’s views—one that’s harder to defeat.
How do you respond to a straw man argument?
The main way to counter a straw man is to point out its use, and to then ask your opponent to prove that your original stance and their distorted stance are identical, though in some situations you might also choose to either ignore your opponent’s strawman, or to simply accept it and continue the discussion.
What is Steelman and strawman?
Definition and explanation
A strawman is a version of an argument that no one actually believes, but is very easy to dispute. In contrast, a steelwoman argument (others use steelman, but variety is the spice of life) is the strongest version of an argument, sometimes called the principle of charity.
What is a false dilemma fallacy?
Sometimes called the “either-or” fallacy, a false dilemma is a logical fallacy that presents only two options or sides when there are many options or sides. Essentially, a false dilemma presents a “black and white” kind of thinking when there are actually many shades of gray.
What is ignorance appeal?
This fallacy occurs when you argue that your conclusion must be true, because there is no evidence against it. This fallacy wrongly shifts the burden of proof away from the one making the claim.
What is hasty generalization fallacy?
The hasty generalization fallacy is sometimes called the over-generalization fallacy. It is basically making a claim based on evidence that it just too small. Essentially, you can’t make a claim and say that something is true if you have only an example or two as evidence.
What is a post hoc logical fallacy?
Short for “post hoc, ergo propter hoc,” a Latin phrase meaning “after this, therefore because of this.” The phrase expresses the logical fallacy of assuming that one thing caused another merely because the first thing preceded the other.
What is slippery slope fallacy example?
If you don’t do your homework, you’ll fail the class. If you fail this class, you won’t graduate from school. If you don’t graduate, you won’t get into college. If you don’t attend a good college, you won’t get a good job.
Related posts:
How to Prove “Possibly P if Necessarily P” in Kripke Modal Logic?
Do (any) philosophers worry if there can be a priori truths about a changing world?
A reply to the Chinese room argument?
Is it possible to determine the truth values of propositional proof?
When to use logic symbol variants?
Are these logical arguments against the existence of a god?
Can a beginner in Philosophy understand the following books?
Why is Ayn Rand’s Objectivism philosophy dismissed by academics?
Are there any aspects of science which do not change over time?
Proving that man is not born with certain skills?