Contents
Can there be infinite regress?
An infinite regress is an infinite series of entities governed by a recursive principle that determines how each entity in the series depends on or is produced by its predecessor. In the epistemic regress, for example, a belief is justified because it is based on another belief that is justified.
What is the epistemic regress problem?
The epistemic regress problem is commonly posed as an argument for skepticism: to know any proposition P we must know a proposition Q that provides evidence for P, but this requires an endless regress of known propositions—a circle or an infinite regress—so, since we cannot acquire knowledge by means of such regresses, …
What is the infinite regress problem?
An infinite regress is a series of appropriately related elements with a first member but no last member, where each element leads to or generates the next in some sense. An infinite regress argument is an argument that makes appeal to an infinite regress.
What is infinite regress example?
For example, the statement “S is true” entails the infinite regress, (1) S is true; (2) (S is true) is true; (3) «S is true) is true) is true, etc. For it is impos- sible for (1) to be true and (2) to be false; it is impossible for (2) to be true and Page 14 216 Claude Gratton (3) to be false, etc.
Is time finite or infinite?
As a universe, a vast collection of animate and inanimate objects, time is infinite. Even if there was a beginning, and there might be a big bang end, it won’t really be an end. The energy left behind will become something else; the end will be a beginning.
Is infinite regress a logical fallacy?
It’s a fallacy because it is begging the question that is to say that it is a circular argument. Whether referring to the origins of the universe or any other regressive context, the answer simply moves the question back into infinite regress rather than answering it.
What is infinite regress Aristotle?
Project summary. Infinite Regress Arguments attempt to refute a position by showing that the position leads to an absurd infinite sequence. This argument strategy is used in collaborative reasoning in everyday life, in science and in philosophy. It is especially prominent, and easy to study, in Plato and Aristotle.
How does Coherentism solve the epistemic regress problem?
Coherentism excludes such foundations by affirming that all justified beliefs are justified in virtue of their relations to other beliefs. Thus, on the coherentist solution to the regress problem no evidence chains terminate in immediately justified, foundational beliefs. In a sense, all justification is inferential.
Does Aquinas believe in infinite regress?
Thomas Aquinas often wielded the idea of an infinite regress in his theological and philosophical treatises. In the famous Five Ways, the notion of the impossibility of a regress of events or operations plays a key role in each of the first three proofs for God’s existence.
Is universe finite or infinite?
The observable universe is finite in that it hasn’t existed forever. It extends 46 billion light years in every direction from us. (While our universe is 13.8 billion years old, the observable universe reaches further since the universe is expanding).
Is time in Black Hole infinite?
No. It is proportional to the enfolding surface tension commonly called a singularity or quantum gravity. The smaller the singularity, the slower the rate of time. This affects the ability of the black hole to assimilate and increase value short of merging with other black holes.
Is time a illusion?
According to theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli, time is an illusion: our naive perception of its flow doesn’t correspond to physical reality. Indeed, as Rovelli argues in The Order of Time, much more is illusory, including Isaac Newton’s picture of a universally ticking clock.
Is time the 4th dimension?
According to Einstein , you need to describe where you are not only in three-dimensional space — length, width and height — but also in time. Time is the fourth dimension. So to know where you are, you have to know what time it is.
Is our future already written?
The future, though it remains unknown to you, seems to be written already. Einstein himself described it thus: “People like us, who believe in physics, know that the distinction between past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”
Related posts:
How to contextualise reading Friere’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed?
How does the philosophy of science explore original research formulation?
Are there any sources dealing with Clark’s *Without Evidence or Argument: A Defense of Reformed Epistemology*?
What is an argument with necessarily true conclusion?
Is This Proof of Existence and a Solution to P=NP Problem?
Nature of Logic and Mathematics, and its relationship with God and materialism?
Does a rejection of the principle of sufficient reason result in blurring the distinction between being and non-being?
Is the Phaedo relevant to a materialist?
What is the meaning of “epistemic”, “epistemological” and “ontological” in this context?
What is the best argument against the argument of consent in antinatalism?