Like Hegel, Kierkegaard considers life to be dynamic, and spiritual. Perhaps Kierkegaard is an ethical idealist, as Hegel is an absolute idealist. 4. Kierkegaard, along with Hegel, maintains that the abstract is the unreal.
Contents
Is Kierkegaard a Hegelian?
Instead of simply rejecting Hegel, Kierkegaard consistently borrowed from and reinterpreted Hegelian concepts and methodologies to suit his purposes, even when his purpose ran counter to that of Hegel. Hence, Kierkegaard simply cannot be the rabid anti-Hegelian he is often made out to be.
What did Kierkegaard not like about Hegel?
[8] The primary opposition between Kierkegaard and Hegel can be conceptualized as the opposition between Ur-Christianity and cultural Christianity. In my interpretation of Hegel, it is Christianity that draws the decisive distinction between antiquity and modern times.
How are Nietzsche and Kierkegaard similar?
Abstract. Soren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche both felt that life is irrational. They were problem thinkers who chose not to follow the systematic approach to philosophy as their predecessors did. In this regard, they stood on common ground.
What did Kierkegaard and Nietzsche have in common What was the major difference between them?
Kierkegaard’s religiousness emphasizes faith that is in its tension with doubt. The truth in subjectivity is not something that simply exists for all time, but must be wrestled and eventually submitted to. Nietzsche prefers to make truth submit to the will of greatness. Kierkegaard gives over to God.
Does Nietzsche agree with Kierkegaard?
There’s no evidence that Nietzsche read Kierkegaard; the latter had not been translated into German. However, there is strong evidence that Nietzsche knew of Kierkegaard through the secondary literature; furthermore, Georges Brandes was a clear link between the two of them.
What did Kierkegaard and Nietzsche contribution to existentialism?
Thus, although Kierkegaard writes poetically of the self, Nietzsche truly provides existentialism with an all-encompassing critique of contemporary thought by beginning with basal ontology and then moving forward, in an engaging fashion. Kierkegaard does not have a strident ontology of anything but the self.
Is Kierkegaard an existentialist?
For his emphasis on individual existence—particularly religious existence—as a constant process of becoming and for his invocation of the associated concepts of authenticity, commitment, responsibility, anxiety, and dread, Søren Kierkegaard is generally considered the father of existentialism.
Who did Kierkegaard influence?
Jerry Fodor has written that Kierkegaard was “a master and way out of the league that the rest of us [philosophers] play in”. Kierkegaard has also had a considerable influence on 20th-century literature. Figures deeply influenced by his work include Walker Percy, W. H. Auden, Franz Kafka, David Lodge, and John Updike.
Was Kierkegaard a nihilist?
Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855): The nineteenth century Danish theologian Søren Kierkegaard—who many academics regard among the first existentialist philosophers—wrote about nihilism, calling it “leveling.” Kierkegaard felt that leveling was not a positive thing, because the problem of nihilism was that it meant …
Does Kierkegaard believe in God?
Kierkegaard believed that Christianity was not a doctrine to be taught, but rather a life to be lived. He considered that many Christians who were relying totally on external proofs of God were missing out a true Christian experience, which is precisely the relationship one individual can have with God.
What is Kierkegaard most famous for?
In addition to being dubbed “the father of existentialism,” Kierkegaard is best known as a trenchant critic of Hegel and Hegelianism and for his invention or elaboration of a host of philosophical, psychological, literary and theological categories, including: anxiety, despair, melancholy, repetition, inwardness, irony …
Related posts:
Papers on the history of the answers to Parmenides?
Ethics vs manipulation: Is it ethical to manipulate and is ethics a form of manipulation?
Philosophy of understanding?
Entanglement and the computability of nature?
What drives religious belief?
Who were the late renaissance/early enlightenment atheists?
Nominalist views and contradictions?
Philosophical justification for giving certain animals rights of a person?
Does logical positivism necessarily entail reductionism?
Is there any relation between an Argument and corresponding conditional?