How can substance dualism survive the arguments from neuroscience?

What is argument of substance dualism?

Substance dualists typically argue that the mind and the body are composed of different substances and that the mind is a thinking thing that lacks the usual attributes of physical objects: size, shape, location, solidity, motion, adherence to the laws of physics, and so on.

Do neuroscientists believe in dualism?

Abstract. Although the dualistic concept is unpopular among neuroscientists involved in experimental studies of the brain, neurophysiological literature is full of covert dualistic statements on the possibility of understanding neural mechanisms of human consciousness.

What is dualism in neuroscience?

In the philosophy of mind, mind–body dualism denotes either the view that mental phenomena are non-physical, or that the mind and body are distinct and separable.

Why does Descartes argue for a substance dualism what is meant by a substance dualism?

Descartes was a substance dualist. He believed that there were two kinds of substance: matter, of which the essential property is that it is spatially extended; and mind, of which the essential property is that it thinks.

What is the best argument for substance dualism?

1. The Basic Argument for Substance Dualism

  • (1) If we can exist without bodies, then we cannot be bodies.
  • (2) We can exist without bodies.
  • (3) Therefore, we cannot be bodies.


How does substance dualism work?

mind-body dualism



That version, now often called substance dualism, implies that mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a mind-body (substance) dualist would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical mechanism.