Equivocation Fallacy: When the context of similarity is not the context of the argument?

What is an example of equivocation fallacy?

The fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way, with one meaning in one portion of the argument and then another meaning in another portion of the argument. Examples: I have the right to watch “The Real World.” Therefore it’s right for me to watch the show.

Does equivocation make an argument invalid?

The double meaning of the word ‘star’ creates the fallacy. So an argument using equivocation will appear to be valid but given the double meaning of the word, it is not.

What is a false equivocation?

False equivalence is a logical fallacy in which an equivalence is drawn between two subjects based on flawed or false reasoning. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency. Colloquially, a false equivalence is often called “comparing apples and oranges.” False Equivalence. Jesus Christ.

What is another name for equivocation fallacy?

Equivocation is a fallacy by which a specific word or phrase in an argument is used with more than one meaning. It’s also known as semantic equivocation.

How do you use equivocation in a sentence?

1. Using equivocation, the devious child said “I guess someone took it” when his mother asked him about the money the had stolen from her purse. 2. The dishonest car salesman was careful with his speech, using equivocation to con the buyers into thinking the van was a good car without actually lying.

On which type of ambiguity is the fallacy of equivocation based?

Equivocation. (Also known as doublespeak) A fallacy that occurs when one uses an ambiguous term or phrase in more than one sense, thus rendering the argument misleading. The ambiguity in this fallacy is lexical and not grammatical, meaning the term or phrase that is ambiguous has two distinct meanings.

What is the difference between equivocation and Amphiboly?

verbal fallacies: those due to equivocation, amphiboly, combination or division of words, accent, and form of expression. Whereas equivocation involves the ambiguity of a single word, amphiboly consists of the ambiguity of a complex expression (e.g., “I shot an elephant in my pajamas”).

What is an example of a fallacy of ambiguity?

For example: “All beetles have six legs. John Lennon is a Beatle, so John Lennon has six legs.” We can render the above argument valid (but not sound) by adding the premiss “All Beatles are beetles.” The two syllogisms that comprise the sorites are, then, “All beetles have six legs.

Which of the following is the best definition of equivocate?

Definition of equivocate
intransitive verb. 1 : to use equivocal language especially with intent to deceive. 2 : to avoid committing oneself in what one says. Other Words from equivocate Synonyms Choose the Right Synonym Example Sentences Learn More About equivocate.

What is the role of equivocation in argumentation?

Equivocation allows the writer or speaker to avoid making a firm commitment to any particular position, which is a useful – though very deceptive – way of avoiding counterarguments or hard questions. In formal arguments, equivocation can be used to make a deceptively persuasive argument.

How do you correct equivocation?

The method for dealing with the equivocation fallacy is relatively straightforward; you simply need to identify the word or expression in the argument that is used with different meanings, and point out this issue, while explaining how this shift invalidates the original argument.

Is equivocation a rhetorical device?

Equivocation is used in logic as well as in literature. In logic, it is an informal fallacy the result of which is that a specific word demonstrates multiple meanings or nuances or shades of meanings. In literary terms, it creates ambiguity in such a way that readers could deduce their own meanings.

What is ambiguity and examples?

Ambiguity Definition
Ambiguous words or statements lead to vagueness and confusion and shape the basis for instances of unintentional humor. For instance, it is ambiguous to say “I rode a black horse in red pajamas,” because it may lead us to think the horse was wearing red pajamas.

Why is using ambiguous language in an argument a problem?

The use of ambiguous expressions in argumentative dialogues can lead to misunderstanding and equivocation. Such ambiguities are here called active ambiguities.

What are the five fallacies of ambiguity?


  • 1.1 Equivocation.
  • 1.2 Amphiboly.
  • 1.3 Accent.
  • 1.4 Composition.
  • 1.5 Division.
  • 1.6 Assignment.

What are the 4 types of ambiguity?

Types of ambiguity

  • Lexical ambiguity. Words have multiple meanings. …
  • Syntactic ambiguity. A sentence has multiple parse trees. …
  • Semantic ambiguity. …
  • Anaphoric ambiguity. …
  • Non-literal speech. …
  • Ellipsis. …
  • Example 2. …
  • Syntactic constraints.

What is equivocation in communication?

Equivocation is ambiguous, indirect, or otherwise unclear communication; it “says something without really saying it.” First, we developed a method for measuring equivocation precisely and showing empirically that equivocations are not lies.

What are logical fallacies in an argument?

Logical fallacies are arguments that may sound convincing, but are based on faulty logic and are therefore invalid. They may result from innocent errors in reasoning, or be used deliberately to mislead others. Taking logical fallacies at face value can lead you to make poor decisions based on unsound arguments.

Which is an example of the red herring fallacy?

More everyday examples of the red herring fallacy include: Distracting a child – “You’re right, that toy in the toy shop looks really fun. Let’s go home and see what fun toys we have there!” Convincing a parent to lend you the car – “I know you don’t want me to borrow the car, but I was going to pick up coffee for you.