Contents
Does morality depend on religion?
Religion and morality are not synonymous. Though religion may depend on morality, and even develop alongside morality, morality does not necessarily depend upon religion, despite some making “an almost automatic assumption” to this effect.
Can we have a good morality even if there is no religion?
It is simply impossible for people to be moral without religion or God. Faith can be very very dangerous, and deliberately to implant it into the vulnerable mind of an innocent child is a grievous wrong. The question of whether or not morality requires religion is both topical and ancient.
What is the relationship between religion and morality?
Morality is thought to pertain to the conduct of human affairs and relations between persons, while religion primarily involves the relationship between human beings and a transcendent reality. In fact, this distinction between religion and morality is a relatively modern one.
Is morality independent of God?
God approves of right actions because they are right and disapproves of wrong actions because they are wrong (moral theological objectivism, or objectivism). So, morality is independent of God’s will; however, since God is omniscient He knows the moral laws, and because He’s moral, He follows them.
Are religious people more moral?
A new study suggests that religious people aren’t more likely to do good than their nonreligious counterparts. And while they may vehemently disagree with one another at times, liberals and conservatives also tend to be on par when it comes to behaving morally.
Is morality born or made?
Morality is not just something that people learn, argues Yale psychologist Paul Bloom: It is something we are all born with. At birth, babies are endowed with compassion, with empathy, with the beginnings of a sense of fairness.
Can you say that religion is a double edged sword?
YES religion is double edged sword Becoz some people are here who think that religion is everything for them. Actually religion also creates unity and disunity both. Sometimes people of same religion create unity and people of different religions create disunity.
What role did religion and morality play in the debate over slavery?
Racism has been a major issue in the United States of America. This issue can be traced back to the slavery era, where slave owners used religion as a means to justify slavery, while abolitionists used religion to show the evils of the practice.
How did Aristotle view morality?
Aristotle defines moral virtue as a disposition to behave in the right manner and as a mean between extremes of deficiency and excess, which are vices. We learn moral virtue primarily through habit and practice rather than through reasoning and instruction.
Can a virtuous person do something immoral?
One objection to virtue ethics is that it’s possible for a virtuous person to act entirely from virtue and still commit an immoral act.
Why do people do wrong according to Socrates?
Socrates believed that no one does wrong voluntarily. Evil is the result of ignorance. If people knew what was the right thing to do they would do it.
What is morality according to Plato?
Like most other ancient philosophers, Plato maintains a virtue-based eudaemonistic conception of ethics. That is to say, happiness or well-being (eudaimonia) is the highest aim of moral thought and conduct, and the virtues (aretê: ‘excellence’) are the requisite skills and dispositions needed to attain it.
What is morality according to Socrates?
Socrates thinks that morality is identical to prudence. Many contemporary moral philosophers would give roughly three reasons for postulating the existence of a morality that is distinct from prudence. These are the Happiness of Tyrants Objection, the Intentions Matter Objection and the Kantian Objection.
What is morality according to Kant?
Kant holds that if there is a fundamental law of morality, it is a categorical imperative. Taking the fundamental principle of morality to be a categorical imperative implies that moral reasons override other sorts of reasons. You might, for instance, think you have a self interested reason to cheat on exam.
Related posts:
How was arranging the trade of POW Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five detainees possible without “negotiating with terrorists”?
How did Aristotelian logic view this?
Are there any philosophers who advance a non-foundationalist absolutism?
Is a proof still valid if many people say that is true?
How did Aristotle arrive at the definition of substance/ousia?
How can I make my friend who likes IT and physics interested in philosophy?
Clarification of definitions of physical quantities?
Questioning Kant’s resolution to induction?
Is happiness the coherence of belief and feeling?
What fallacy dismisses a conclusion because supporters give invalid arguments for it?