Contents
Is it possible for a sound argument to have a false premise?
A sound argument has both a valid form and true premises. Unsound arguments can be valid but such arguments will also have false premises. If an argument is valid and has a true conclusion, then it must be sound. A valid argument can have false premises and a true conclusion.
Is it possible to have a sound argument that isn’t valid?
A valid argument may still have a false conclusion. When we construct our arguments, we must aim to construct one that is not only valid, but sound. A sound argument is one that is not only valid, but begins with premises that are actually true. The example given about toasters is valid, but not sound.
What are the conditions of a sound argument?
Soundness: An argument is sound if it meets these two criteria: (1) It is valid. (2) Its premises are true. In other words, a sound argument has the right form AND it is true. Note #3: A sound argument will always have a true conclusion.
Is it impossible for a sound argument to have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. True. A sound argument is one that is valid with all true premises. If an argument is valid, that means that IF the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true.
Do you think that it is possible to have a deductive invalid sound argument?
A deductive argument cannot be both valid and unsound. A deductive argument can be either valid or invalid and still have true premisses. When the conclusion of a deductive argument is true, the argument must be sound. When the premisses of a deductive argument are true, the conclusion is always true as well.
Are all unsound arguments invalid?
If a deductive argument is invalid, then it must also be unsound. If an argument is invalid, then it must have at least one false premise. If an argument has a conclusion that is certainly false, then the argument must be invalid. If the premises and conclusion are all false, the argument must be invalid.
Can an invalid argument have true premises?
So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. 4. If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false.
What is a premise in an argument?
A premise is a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion. There can be one or many premises in a single argument. A conclusion is a statement in an argument that indicates of what the arguer is trying to convince the reader/listener.
What is a valid but unsound argument?
An argument is valid if and only if it is impossible for its. premises to be true, while its conclusion is false. So one way for an argument to be bad is for it to be invalid; another way for it to be bad is for it to be valid, but unsound (i.e., for it to be valid but have one or more false premises).
Can a deductively valid argument have false premises?
A valid deductive argument can have all false premises and a false conclusion.
What is not a sound argument?
But the truth or falsity of the premises has nothing to do with validity: the argument is valid because it follows a valid argument form. The fact that one of the premises is false means that it’s not sound. If both premises were false, it would of course still be unsound.
Can premises be valid?
Valid: an argument is valid if and only if it is necessary that if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true; if all the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true; it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false.
Can a valid argument have false premises example?
If Elizabeth Taylor is president of the United States, then Elizabeth Taylor must be 35 years of age or older. Elizabeth Taylor is president of the United States. So, Elizabeth Taylor must be 35 years of age or older. For either example, the logic is valid but the premises are false.
What makes a premise false?
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. A false premise is an incorrect proposition that forms the basis of an argument or syllogism. Since the premise (proposition, or assumption) is not correct, the conclusion drawn may be in error.
Can a sound argument have false premises and a true conclusion?
A valid argument can have false premises; and it can have a false conclusion. But if a valid argument has all true premises, then it must have a true conclusion.
What is it called when a premise is false?
The fallacy fallacy.
False premises are a feature of informal logical fallacies in particular, which are logical fallacies that occur when there is a flaw in the premises of an argument, which renders the argument logically unsound.
What is a sound argument?
Sound Arguments
Firstly, a sound argument is a deductive argument. It’s trying to establish conclusive support for its conclusion. Secondly, the argument is valid: the premises, if true, would guarantee that the conclusion is also true. And on top of all that, the premises are actually true.
What are the two types of premises an argument can have?
Put another way, a premise includes the reasons and evidence behind a conclusion, says Study.com. A premise may be either the major or the minor proposition of a syllogism—an argument in which two premises are made and a logical conclusion is drawn from them—in a deductive argument.
What is a defect in an argument other than its having false premises?
A fallacy is a defect in an argument other than its having false premises. It refers to a defect that is difficult to be detected. An informal fallacy is a defect in the content of an argument.
What do you call the defect in an argument other than its having false premise Brainly?
A fallacy is a defect in an argument—i.e., something which causes the argument to be unsound—but the defect is anything OTHER than merely having false premises.
Do logical fallacies weaken argument?
Logical fallacies make an argument weak by using mistaken beliefs/ideas, invalid arguments, illogical arguments, and/or deceptiveness. If you are arguing, avoid fallacies of thought because they create weaknesses in an argument. Here are some of the most common fallacies to be aware of.
Related posts:
How do I put in mind that “I am going to die”?
Popper on probability?
Where and why does Heidegger use the phrase “always already”?
Can definitions be experimentally tested?
Can science prove or provide evidence that the brain is the source of the mind?
Human belief systems and reason?
Occam’s razor and the Multiverse Hypotesis?
How well did Aristotle feel his belief in the eternity of the universe was established?
Do objective improvements to descriptive ethics always improve normative ethics?
How is it possible for an infinite number of moments to have elapsed prior to now?