Can all inductive arguments be written as deductive arguments?

Can an inductive argument be deductive?

When such a proof is given by a mathematician, and when all the premises are true, then the conclusion follows necessarily. Therefore, such an inductive argument is deductive.

Can an inductive argument in its deductive form be invalid?

A deductive argument succeeds when, if you accept the evidence as true (the premises), you must accept the conclusion. Inductive argument: involves the claim that the truth of its premises provides some grounds for its conclusion or makes the conclusion more probable; the terms valid and invalid cannot be applied.

Are all inductive arguments valid?

Inductive arguments are not usually said to be “valid” or “invalid,” but according to the degree of support which the premises do provide for the conclusion, they may be said to be “strong” or “weak” over a spectrum of varying degrees of likelihood.

Can you give an example of a deductive and inductive statements?

Inductive Reasoning: Most of our snowstorms come from the north. It’s starting to snow. This snowstorm must be coming from the north. Deductive Reasoning: All of our snowstorms come from the north.

Can an inductive argument and a deductive argument have the same conclusion quizlet?

No, because there are no degrees of validity. Can an inductive argument and a deductive argument have the same conclusion? Is it possible to construct an argument with no premises? No, since there would be nothing from which to infer a conclusion.

Can inductive and deductive reasoning be applied simultaneously?

Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broad generalizations, and deductive reasoning the other way around. Both approaches are used in various types of research, and it’s not uncommon to combine them in one large study.

Can a deductive argument be invalid?

A deductive argument is said to be valid if and only if it takes a form that makes it impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion nevertheless to be false. Otherwise, a deductive argument is said to be invalid.

Is deductive reasoning always true?

Deductive reasoning is black and white; a conclusion is either true or false and cannot be partly true or partly false. We decide whether a deductive statement is true by assessing the strength of the link between the premises and the conclusion.

What is the difference between inductive and deductive arguments?

Inductive reasoning involves starting from specific premises and forming a general conclusion, while deductive reasoning involves using general premises to form a specific conclusion. Conclusions reached via deductive reasoning cannot be incorrect if the premises are true.

Which terms may not be applied to deductive arguments?

Which terms may not be applied to deductive arguments? Context can never change a deductive argument into an inductive argument. Some invalid arguments have a true conclusion.

Can an inductive argument be strong and Uncogent?

Strength comes in degrees. The conclusion of one strong argument might be more probable than that of another. An cogent (inductive) argument is one that is both strong and has true premises. An uncogent (inductive) argument is either a weak argument or a strong argument with a false premise.

Can a valid deductive argument ever have false premises Why or why not?

A valid argument can have false premises; and it can have a false conclusion. But if a valid argument has all true premises, then it must have a true conclusion.

Can a deductive argument have all false premises and a true conclusion?

5. A valid deductive argument cannot have all false premises and a true conclusion.

Can a valid deductive argument ever have false premises Why or why not quizlet?

No, it’s not possible. A deductively valid argument is such that if the premises are true , its conclusion must be absolutely, positively be true.

Can a valid argument have all true premises and a false conclusion?

TRUE: A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false.

Can every proposition be used as a premise in one argument and as a conclusion in another?

Can a proposition be a premise of one argument and a conclusion (either intermediate or main) of another argument? No, by the definition of a premise, it cannot have anything in support of it.

Do all arguments have conclusions?

All valid arguments have all true premises and true conclusions. All sound arguments are valid arguments. If an argument is valid, then it must have at least one true premise.

Can an argument have only one premise?

A premise is a statement in an argument that provides reason or support for the conclusion. There can be one or many premises in a single argument. A conclusion is a statement in an argument that indicates of what the arguer is trying to convince the reader/listener.

Can a valid argument be unsound?

Another way to put the same idea is that an argument is valid when the truth of its premises guarantees the truth of its conclusion. either invalid or has one or more false premises; so, a valid argument is unsound if and only if it has one ore more false premises.

Are all persuasive arguments valid?

No, not all persuasive arguments are valid. “To persuade someone of something is to influence her opinion by any number of means, including emotional appeals, linguistic or rhetorical tricks, deception, threats, propaganda, and more. Reasoned argument does not necessarily play any part at all in persuasion” (50).

What is an invalid argument?

Similarly, arguments may be described as valid or invalid, but statements cannot. An argument is said to be an invalid argument if its conclusion can be false when its hypothesis is true. An example of an invalid argument is the following: “If it is raining, then the streets are wet.

Can inductive arguments be sound?

This attribute applies to both deductive arguments (by virtue of validity) and inductive arguments (by virtue of inductive strength.) A good deductive argument is not only valid, but is also sound. A good inductive argument is not only inductively strong, but is also cogent.

What is unsound argument?

An unsound argument is either an invalid argument or a valid argument with at least one false premise. Page 20. Some Final Notes on Validity and Soundness. A valid argument preserves truth. That is, if we have a valid argument, and if all of the premises are in fact true, then the conclusion will always be in fact true …

Related posts:

What logical fallacy is “if some of my enemies/adversaries affirm my claim then it is correct”? Does any mathematician today work on a logic he explicitly presents as somehow true of human logic, as Boole did in his time? What is the difference between ‘instantiate’ and ‘exemplify’, if any? Predicate logic help? Marxism – primary contradiction of capitalism? Is computationalism really a theory, or is it more like a doctrine or creed? What motivates Wittgenstein’s declaration of the world as the totality of facts? Is there a philosophical term for an invalid argument based on extreme (and irrelevant) comparisons to Nazis? Fireflies in a mechanical car? Is it fair to characterise Nietszche as a reformer of Christianity, rather than a destroyer?