True premises can lead to either a true or a false conclusion in an invalid argument. In these examples, bad luck rather than bad logic led to the false conclusion. But, that the premises are true and the conclusion is false conclusively proves that this argument is invalid since they are the defining condition.
Contents
Can a true premise have a false conclusion?
TRUE: A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false.
What is the difference between a true premise and a false premise?
For the premises to be true, all of them need to be true. But, for the premises to be false, only one need be false. So, an argument with a mixture of true and false premises is still considered to be an argument with false premises–it is false that all of the premises are true.
Can you have true premises and a true conclusion?
Indeed, by definition, any valid argument with true premises will also have a true conclusion.
Can you have false premises and a false conclusion?
A valid argument can have false premises; and it can have a false conclusion. But if a valid argument has all true premises, then it must have a true conclusion.
What makes a premise false?
Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. A false premise is an incorrect proposition that forms the basis of an argument or syllogism. Since the premise (proposition, or assumption) is not correct, the conclusion drawn may be in error.
What is false conclusion?
A false conclusion is where all given reasons and evidence point to a given conclusion, but due to the omission, incorrect assumption, lie or missing piece of information required, the individual arrives at a false conclusion.
What does a true premise mean?
A premise or premiss is a true or false statement that helps form the body of an argument, which logically leads to a true or false conclusion.
What can we say for sure about an argument with all true premises and a false conclusion?
If an argument is unsound and the conclusion is false, the argument may still have true premises. In fact, if we have an argument with true premises and a false conclusion, then we know that the argument is invalid (and unsound). If an argument is valid and it has false premises, then it must have a false conclusion.
What is the true premises test?
Terms in this set (23) You assume all premises are true, and see if the premises provide good reason to the conclusion. a deductive that passes both tests. If it only passes one or neither, then it is not sound.
What is conclusion as valid or true?
true
Valid: an argument is valid if and only if it is necessary that if all of the premises are true, then the conclusion is true; if all the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true; it is impossible that all the premises are true and the conclusion is false. Invalid: an argument that is not valid.
What is a premise example?
In logical argument, a premise is a statement or assumption on which an argument is based. For example, if a person looks at a green apple and says, “this apple is sour,” the premises of this argument could be: 1) Green apples are sour.
What are the 3 Formal fallacies?
The standard Aristotelian logical fallacies are:
- Fallacy of four terms (Quaternio terminorum);
- Fallacy of the undistributed middle;
- Fallacy of illicit process of the major or the minor term;
- Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise.
What is an argument with false premises and false conclusion?
So, an argument with a mixture of true and false premises is still considered to be an argument with false premises–it is false that all of the premises are true. Nevertheless, in these examples, the conclusion is false. For either example, the logic is invalid and the premises are false. Here the conclusion is false.
What is a valid argument with false premises example?
For example, in the argument “all birds can fly, and penguins can’t fly, so penguins aren’t birds”, the premise that “all birds can fly” is false, since some birds can’t fly, and this renders the argument logically unsound.
What is an example of a valid argument with a false conclusion?
If Elizabeth Taylor is president of the United States, then Elizabeth Taylor must be younger than 35. Elizabeth Taylor is president of the United States. So, Elizabeth Taylor must be younger than 35. For either example, the logic is valid but the premises are false.
Related posts:
Is there any connection between mental illness and philosophical thought?
Does economics as a science or a technology take only the legitimate economy as its proper field of study?
Is it human nature to feel existential anguish?
What is a counter argument for the proposition that reaching the truth involves abandoning language and other intellectual instruments?
What role does Hume’s principle (HP) play in neo-logicism?
Does neurorealism imply a fear of Cartesian dualism that philosophy should rightly address?
What’s the name of the fallacy when you use a worst situation to ignore the current?
Does Quine’s relativism only follow if the data of theories is the only source of a theory’s justification?
Can Hasker’s emergent dualism work (in principle) with a non-spatial mind without energy?
Is racism a moral judgement?